Ransom's Bond book cover


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


sixdays

Without

sundacloud

Synapse Book Cover

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

book

Elwood Wendie
Tell Me What To Write PDF Print Write e-mail
Sunday, 14 August 2011 14:44

My friend, Elwood Wendie, is between manuscripts and had some time to share his thoughts with us. Welcome back, Elwood! Oh, and EW insisted that I post his photo because he noticed that I usually put up the author's photo when I do interviews. So, here's the photo he sent me:

Elwood Wendie

Very handsome likeness, EW. ;) The floor is yours...


Do Women Really Want To Be Told What To Do? -OR- How I Learned Not To Write

As a ghost writer, I don't actually write anything that's my own. But I wish I could. So I went to some writer's conventions and workshops. Much to my surprise, I never learned anything about writing. But I learned a tremendous amount about not writing.

And about women.

The fact that the conferences and workshops were full of women, should have made sense, because if we guys aspire to be writers we don't bother going to conferences or taking classes. We just write. Me, I was still on the fence about the whole thing. After all, I'm making a good living writing other people's books. Why mess with that?

Anyway, in one conference there was this lady talking, Nora something-or-other (no not Roberts, she doesn't give workshops. She's too busy making buckets full of money.)  So this Nora was all Queen Elizabeth like (the second one silly, not the first) and she said, all regal like, "Write about emotion." And she made this twisty wave of her hand. And nobody wrote anything.

Nobody.

"What do you mean by emotion?" one lady asked.

"Yeah, can you define emotion?" prompted another.

A big argument broke out as The Queen offered some wisdom about digging deep into your emotional psyche and so forth. I didn't really understand it, but was hoping to catch on by listening in on the arguments. It got pretty rough in there. I couldn't believe they were actually questioning The Queen. Being a guy, I'm used to this sort of treatment from women, but I didn't realize women did this to other women.  I really need to get out of the office more.

The Queen finally restored order and did her best to give a long-winded, but essentially empty explanation. When that failed it was followed by many more, pressing and at times rather ugly questions. At last she resorted to quoting her own work as examples. Not having read her vast lexicon of romance novels, I departed for greener and hopefully less sanguine pastures.

Down the hall I stepped into a large room filled with women sitting at round tables facing a single man of small stature at a podium. He exuded an encouraging level of indifference. Good. At least he wouldn't be asking me to dig deeply into my emotions. I think his initials were DM, but let's call him Ralph.

Ralph cleared his throat. The room was pin drop silent. The women held their collective breath. The only sounds in the room were the swishes of hair being tossed over delicate shoulders and the light rasp of imaginary crumbs being brushed off bosoms.

I could have sat in pleasant reverie all afternoon, even if no one spoke another word. To me it was a little slice of Heaven. Alas, Ralph cleared his throat again in a manner that indicated he was about to speak. After several minutes passed, he did.

"Write about emotion," he said.

Instantly, electric fire spewed from a thousand pens. The cacophony of scratching went on for long minutes while Ralph preened his impeccable tie and stared at the pattern of punched tin squares of ceiling tiles. I sat in motionless awe. Great preening, Ralph. I must have missed that day in guy school.

I had no idea what to write, so I didn't. After about five minutes my mind wandered and I began to contemplate the platinum shades of hair on a busty little blonde across the room.

"You!" his voice echoed in the palatial room "You're not writing."

Thousands of eyes glared in my direction as I melted into the floor. Gulp.

"No, I'm not."

"Why not?"

"'Cause I don't know what to write."

"I said write about emotion."

"What emotion?"

"If I have to tell you, then you are not a writer."

"I...I really don't understand what I'm supposed to do," I protested.

"You must write about emotion."

"I really don't know how, but if you'd shut up for a second, maybe I could learn something from watching these women," I suggested.

"Leave!" His Moses finger pointed toward the door.

I rose on shaky legs and evaporated out the door. I passed the hall of the hotel and spotted the bar. I stopped in and ordered a double Scotch, no ice. After a few sips I recalled Guy School rule number 27. 'Never let on that you have no idea what you're doing. If you appear to be in charge, then you are in charge.' Obviously Ralph had learned that lesson well. It reminded me of FDR. Why, you ask? Because FDR wrote Guy School Rules Volumes, 6, 7 and 9 and it was he who said, "If you think you can, you can. If you think you can't, you can't." Actually, it was rumored that Eleanor wrote Volume 7, but let's not go there. I'll save that for another blog.

I tossed back one more of Scotland's best and then rejoined the throng of people moving from function room to function room. Standing room only in so many of the smaller rooms. However, I did manage to slip into one medium sized room where a man was pacing while waiting for the audience to settle into their seats. He reminded me of one of my son's Marine Corp drill instructors at Paris Island. But this guy was a Green Beret, and that would be Camp Something-or-other. Anyway, let's call him Ralph. He barked the room to order and presented his first slide, a tiger, proud and graceful.

"This is the publishing industry," he said.

His next slide was of a tiger pouncing on a gazelle.

"This is the publishing industry when it gets a hold of a decent manuscript."

Half the room laughed, the other half groaned.

"This could happen to you!" he barked. "Unless you do exactly as I say."

The room fell silent. One man gasped and snuck out the rear door. I wanted to follow him, but those two double Scotches finally kicked in. Instead I suppressed a giggle. Ralph glared and I bowed my head and contritely placed my chin on my chest.

"Drop and give me twenty," he ordered.

I collapsed at three.

With a huff he continued, ignoring the puddle of uselessness I presented on the floor.

"Write about emotion," he commanded the audience of mostly women.

Again, a thousand pens spewed electric fire.

Emotion, I mumbled to myself, you write sci-fi. How do you find emotion in sci-fi? I stared motionless at the nib of my pen contemplating Guy School rule #87, "Speak softly and carry a big stick." Oh, wrong quote. That was Roosevelt, and Teddy at that. I always knew there must have been some way Eleanor learned what to do.

At least this Ralph didn't order me out. He just let me sit there and do nothing while all the women around me scribbled at least 60,000 words.

Slowly realization dawned. These men couldn't write. But every woman in this room could. And yet they liked being told by a guy how to do it. Ralph #1 was a big New York agent.  He was following Guy School rule #42, "Don't do the work yourself, sell what somebody else does." Ralph #2 was following Guy School rule #8, "Orders won't be followed unless you shout them out with proper threats." Whoa. These guys were truly brilliant.

I've decided that writing on my own is too tough, so I'm sticking with ghost writing. Luckily most of my clients aren't women, otherwise, they'd be learning to write their own stories and I'd be out of work fast.

So my question to you ladies (and gents) is: Am I right? Do you really like being told how to write?

 

 

 

 
Stalking the Saber-toothed Tiger PDF Print Write e-mail
Sunday, 29 May 2011 06:10

My friend EW the ghostwriter is back. I made the mistake of lending him a copy of the latest RWR and he had this to say about motivation.

What a savory meal!

In this month's (May, 2011) Romance Writers Report, Shirley Jump discusses ways to overcome procrastination. She gives a number of practical ideas for avoiding distracting behaviors. To me, they sound more like a weight watchers program than something truly applicable to writers.

There is a big difference between writing and dieting. Dieters don't want to diet. They want to have dieted, now be slim, and stop dieting. Writers want to write. And never stop writing. A person who doesn't want to write, but to have written is not a writer. They are writtens. The word is not in the dictionary because they don't exist. Writers actually want to write. Why? I don't know. To paraphrase Louis Armstrong, "If you have to ask, you'll never know." It just is. If you love to write, then you will write. If you love to surf the web more than write, then you will surf.  However, that means you are a surfer, not a writer.

But Shirley is right. Writers often procrastinate. Especially newbies. There is always a reason, kids are screaming, dog wants to go out, husband wants a beer. (BTW, throwing the beer at just the right angle will silence him for about an hour, enough for a couple of hundred words.) Fortunately, my kids don't scream. They screech. The dog doesn't want to go out. He just conveniently poops where I will step in it. And I'm the guy. And I don't like beer, or my wife's aim. Fortunately, my friend Jack sits quietly next to my keyboard, which solves the kids and dog problem. Let's save the wife for another blog, okay?

The problem with writing is that it is a solitary endeavor. It is best done aloooone. What can the kids do to help? Go away. How about hubby? He can be useful by asking for another beer. (One 6-pack = 1200 words, but YMMV.) Problem: being alone isn't fun. Sometimes our imaginary friends (our characters) won't talk to us, the setting won't materialize. That creative bubble won't quite pop. So we procrastinate. Even if we had a beach house all to ourselves, with gentle waves tickling the pebble beach, and birds flying overhead (not directly overhead, remember what the dog did) we would still procrastinate.

Fortunately, when an imaginary friend won't talk, a real one usually will. The answer to procrastination of every flavor and design is an editor, or agent, or if you haven't yet got one or both of those, how about a good critique partner? Having a critique partner is absolutely the best thing for a writer. It allows a person to be alone, but not all alone. When the creativity bubble won't pop, the answer is often an e-mail away. This leads to success. And nothing else succeeds like success.

Shirely says the problem with critique partners is that, with few exceptions, they will not hold your feet to the fire. Of course not. A good critique partner will help you write better. And that is whole point. No one should scold you for not hitting your word count goal. There shouldn't even be a word count goal. Only a love of writing.

The problem lies in finding a good critique partner. A good critique partner is very difficult to find. The reason is that most writers don't know how to critique. (BTW, Kat wrote a great blog for teaching critiquing.) A good critique partner will never say "you can't use adverbs" or "you should write like I do."

We guys have an edge on you women when it comes to critique partners, or team work in general. When we need to go out and kill that Saber-tooth Tiger, we gather together a whole bunch a guys, head out to the forest or plains, and have at it. It takes a lot of guys, especially to carry back the bodies. We don't say, "Oh, your writing was wonderful." We say "Let me teach you how to hunt. You go first." Not only does this result in more dead Saber-tooth Tigers, but larger portions for the happy survivors.

So, next time you find yourself lolling about instead of writing, go out and find a bunch of gals to critique with. Make sure they go first, thin out the pack, and find one to work with. Also, take any one of Kat's classes because you'll learn a lot from her. BTW, you can't have her as a critique partner. She's mine. I already thinned out the pack. Sorry ladies!

 



Thanks for your guy-view insights, EW...I gotta practice my aim....ahem...Because EW is a guy and therefore insists on being glorified, I'm giving away three sets of Donald Maass books on writing craft. The set is: Writing the Breakout Novel and The Breakout Novel Workbook. Just comment on EW's blog to be in the running. Comment by June 1st to win.

Last Updated on Sunday, 29 May 2011 06:46
 
EW Interviews Maeve Greyson PDF Print Write e-mail
Monday, 31 January 2011 14:00

As part of The Wild Rose Press Valentine's Month Blog Tour, I'm proud to present and interview of the awesome Maeve Greyson by my friend Elwood Wendie. Be sure to check out all 11 blogs on the tour and leave multiple comments to enter for a weekly prize worth $25 or a Grand Prize worth over $50. Blogs on tour are:

Meet contemporary YA an adult romance author Linda Kage at http://amielouellen.wordpress.com/
Meet contemporary, paranormal, and historical romance author Caroline Clemmons at http://authorjenniferjakes.blogspot.com/
Meet historical and paranormal romance writer Lilly Gayle at http://www.ajbooks.blogspot.com/
Meet Amie Louellen, author of fun and whimsical contemporary romance at http://lynneroberts.blogspot.com/
Meet erotic western historical author Jennifer Jakes at http://maevegreyson.blogspot.com/
Meet author AJ Nuest at http://amycorwin.blogspot.com/
Meet author Lynne Roberts at http://www.jilljameswrites.com/blog
Meet paranormal romance author Maeve Greyson at http://www.katduncan.net/writeabout
Meet author Amy Corwin at http://lindakage.blogspot.com/
Meet contemporary and paranormal romance author Jill James at http://carolineclemmons.blogspot.com/
Meet romantic suspense author Kat Duncan at http://www.lillygayleromance.blogspot.com

Who wouldn't love a sexy Scot? Check out Maeve's newest release, Beyond a Highland Whisper:

Book: Beyond a Highland Whisper

 

A beguiling Scot from the 1400’s, Latharn Mackay is cursed into a crystal orb when a seductive witch rages against his withheld love.  But there’s hope. The woman destined for him can break the curse by whispering her love aloud.  There’s just a few minor problems to overcome.  Nessa is six hundred years in the future and Latharn can only visit her dreams with a silent presence.  If he speaks, the curse will shatter his soul into bits.  And then there’s still the matter of the sorceress.  You know an enraged woman is going to have the final say…unless love proves more powerful.

The last time Latharn MacKay walked among his kinsman was in Scotland of 1410.  Sensuous and charismatic, all the women wanted him, but none could capture his heart.  Latharn's charm became his curse when a dark sorceress didn’t take rejection well.  She snared his soul into a crystal globe until the one woman destined to be his love whispered his release.  Now all Latharn has to do is find her and guide her to him without speaking a word.

One of the youngest archeologists in St Louis of 2010, Nessa credits one thing for this achievement: the recurring dream of a heart-stopping Highlander since the summer she turned eighteen years old.  Little does she know, he's not some fantasy cooked up by her subconscious.  He’s a trapped soul determined for Nessa to end his six centuries in hell. Can love prevail over the dark magic of a woman scorned?

 

 

 

Okay, Elwood the floor is all yours....!

EW: At what point in your life did you decide to take on the publishing world?

MG: Hmm...I don’t know when I actually decided to take up my shield and jump into the publishing world. I’ve always pretty much lived in an imaginary place as a means of surviving the sometimes more unpleasant aspects of reality. I finally put my daydreams to paper in an attempt to distract my mother from the dark side of her failing health. One of her last statements really stuck with me. She whispered, “I’ve never done anything worth leaving behind.”  She died almost twenty years ago.  I write to leave something behind.

EW: Awesome, Maeve. I applaud your transcending of earthly bounds.

How did you end up writing fiction about dark magic and curses? Do you have some skeletons in your own closet?

MG: In the closet? Are you kidding me? Closet space at my little house is at a premium. There’s LOTS more room to hide the bodies in the woods behind my house. *mwuhahaha*

What is a bit interesting is that while my brother researched our family history, he discovered that one of our ancestors burned at the stake for witchery. Don’t feel too sorry for her. It appears she’d married a gentleman with an older spinster daughter and she and stepdaughter didn’t quite mesh. According to everything my brother found, hubby must’ve always sided with daughter whenever disputes arose. So, wicked great-great-great auntie solved the problem. She served hubby a hearty stew seasoned WITH his daughter.

How do you like your meat, EW? Boiled, baked or fried? Hmm?

EW: I like my meat spit roasted (so I can SEE what I’m eating), but never immolated. Guy School Rule #7: Never Sacrifice. It's what sets us apart from the other heathens.

Were you aware of the trashy novel perception of romance when you decided to write romance and how did you plan to maintain your respectability in the face of that?

MG: Whoever said I was respectable?

EW: Atta girl! My kinda gal!

If you were a conjunction (and/or/not), which would you be and why?

MG: Definitely “or”. My husband’s most endearing request is: “Would you please make up your rabbit-ass mind?”

Of course then I just take longer to decide.  J

EW: Hm...hubby needs to learn Guy School Rule #11: It's okay to think it, but be careful saying it! (Notice the exclamation point here...)

Do you use programs such as Autocritter or are you not a mere grammar mortal like the rest of us? How do you tackle grammar issues in your writing?

MG: Microsoft Word helps with grammar check and its lovely squiggles. Of course, there’s an exception to every rule and it will sometimes lead you astray. If really stumped, I’ll shoot the question out to several of the writer’s loops I’m on and there’s usually several editors willing to offer guidance.

EW: Personally, I love the squiggles.

Do you have a critique partner and how thoroughly does she review your work and wouldn't you really rather have a guy look at it?

MG: Unfortunately, I lost my critique partner and have yet to find another.  No, EW. I wouldn’t rather have a guy look at it. Every time I ask a guy to look at my work, they want to know why there aren’t any pictures.

EW: I hear ya. That's what I said to Kat and she promptly gave up sending me her own work and now she just sends me the kind I really like. The ones with pictures such as Mike Mulligan and His Steam Shovel, and Go Dog. Go!. I like Kat. She is very kind and understanding.

Why in the world would you want to join Writing with the Stars and go through all that grueling review and work and then have to beg for votes on top of it? (Someday I'll tell you about Guy School Rule#12 - The Path of Least Resistance)

MG: EW – where were you back in July when I needed you? Trust me. I had no idea Writing with the Stars was going to be this wild roller coaster ride.  I actually entered my manuscript on the very last day they were accepting entries. I clearly remember thinking, “What the heck? Can’t hurt. Maybe I’ll get some good feedback.”  I NEVER dreamt I’d final and survive this many rounds. And I’m really not good at pleading for votes. Kind of rubs my fur the wrong way because I’m afraid I’m getting on people’s nerves.  But it’s been a great experience and I’ve met some wonderful folks. Whether I manage to take home the win or not, it’s been a positive experience.

EW: Good thing I'm a guy and therefore, lazy.

Thanks for joining me for an interview. Good luck with Eternity's Mark and with your upcoming release from The Wild Rose Press!

MG: Thank you, EW. I’ve enjoyed chatting with you. You’re all right…no matter what Kat says about you. ;-)

 

Kat: No, Maeve he really isn't! Don't encourage him...! Thanks for visiting WriteAbout today, Maeve! Look for Maeve on the web:

Website: http://www.maevegreyson.com/

Blog:
http://maevegreyson.blogspot.com/

Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/maeve.greyson OR http://www.facebook.com/maeve.greyson#!/maeve.greyson.page

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/#!/maevegreyson

Goodreads:
http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2816642

Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/maevegreyson


Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 February 2011 08:18
 
The 4th Point of View PDF Print Write e-mail
Monday, 17 January 2011 15:10

by Elwood Wendie

As a ghost writer, I have invented a long list of techniques that have been successfully avoided by some of the best authors of our times. My latest is a phenomenal new writing tool that authors across the planet will soon be using. And you, dear fellow author, are about to become one of the first to be allowed to use it. It is an entirely new way to convey the character’s perspective. Its name, drum-roll please, the 4th Point of View, or more formally, Worst-Person Ambivalent.

WPA takes all the best features of first person, second person and third person and blends them together. It even covers the options for objective and omniscient points of view. This is the best-ever method for point of view and I'm going to share its secrets with you so you can start using them today.

With the WPA point of view you choose the person in the scene who has the least to gain from what happens in the scene, preferably a secondary character or a minor character such as a maid, cab driver or hardware store clerk. Hopefully, you have too many minor characters to choose from, as there often are in fabulous best-sellers. Not to worry. Just start in one viewpoint and shift from one character to another as the scene goes on. That way you'll give the reader a kind of panoramic view of the scene. It'll be just as if the readers are there with you in your head as you visualized the scene. Cool, huh? This is a fine example of the "head-hopping" that writers, editors and agents are always talking about, so it must be an important technique to know about and practice.

The Ambivalent part comes from the meaning of ambivalent: having two conflicting feelings about something at the same time. Ambivalence is an emotion that's very hard to capture with ordinary points of view. That's where the Worst-Person Ambivalent point of view can be a saving grace. Ambivalent people have to resolve their conflicting feelings. They can do this by asking a lot of questions, hoping the reader will interject the answers for them and resolve the story's conflict. For example:

Does she love me or hate me? Should I accept her offer or refuse it? Should I stand up for myself or will I look like a complete jerk if I say something negative? Should I believe what she says or is she lying to protect her father's business?

A string of these kinds of questions is always useful in Worst-person Ambivalent, otherwise how are you going to convey the characters' conflicting emotions and thoughts to the reader and get the reader hooked into what the character is worried about?

The other option for ambivalent is also useful. It comes from the fact that many people misunderstand the meaning of the word ambivalent and take it to mean that the person doesn't care one way or the other. This opens up a whole new avenue for the writer. No emotions at all. Completely wooden and dry prose. Don't let on at all to the reader that the character feels strongly one way or the other about an issue. After all, when a character has mixed emotions about something, you don't really want to say too much. You might end up swaying the reader into drawing conclusions about how the character feels.

You see, most readers are actually writer wanna-bees. (Don’t believe me, then why does Google have over three million free e-books available?) Worst-Person Ambivalent allows the reader to make up her own story as she goes. Why pin her down to an actual story? It’s virtual ambivalence! You think e-books are the next hottest thing? Wrong! WPA-books are the new wild frontier.

You can go ahead and thank me now...

 
Gender Genres PDF Print Write e-mail
Sunday, 09 January 2011 12:40

By Elwood Wendie

One advantage of being a ghost writer, and therefore not existing, is that I am sometimes able to be a male hiding in the female dominated romance genre. I can apply the rules every male must learn in Guy School. For example;

Guy School Rule #37 - Compete, don’t cooperate.

Romance writers (aka women) are always trying to help each other. They believe that if they work together to write better, it will improve the craft and everyone will be served. Guys on the other hand, believe that every book you sell is one less that I could sell. This superior thinking is why men dominate every other genre.

Women, in their counter-attack against men, will cooperate only with themselves and have created their own monolithic organization to dominate and purify the romance genre. This all started in the great state of Texas in the form of The Romance Writers of America, and has now spread far beyond the state borders to engulf the entire female planet. There is no male counterpart, no Mainstream Writers of America, or Action Adventure Writers. Guys would never cooperate long enough for such a group to form, There is a Mystery Writers of America, but what do you expect after someone as dominant as Agatha Christie?

This great sisterhood has been very effective to keep men out. If a guy does come along, they simply circle the wagons by creating a rule that disqualifies him from the romance genre. Nicolas Sparks does not write romance. He breaks the happy ending rule. Therefore he writes romantic fiction. Bye-bye, Nicky! Work on those happy endings!

These women have created a whole series of artificial rules designed to keep men out of their precious territory. For example, they don’t allow the use of adverbs. '"No," he said smirkingly.' is perfectly and acceptably used by guys, but will raise the ire of a whole gaggle of romance writers. Every adverb, they claim, is a lost opportunity to add emotional content and engage the reader. They would have you write: "'No." His irritating smirk enraged every fiber of her female sensibility.' Men say, use the adverb and move on. After all, it’s the plot that matters, not the emotions.

What are The Rules? Ha, that is the Catch 22. If you have to ask, then I can’t tell you. You just have to know. It’s a female osmosis thing. I'm sure this is why Kat is always telling me "There are no rules!"

However, women have planted the seeds of their sisterhood’s demise. The headlong charge into e-books is being led by the romance genre. This new wild and wooly west has attracted writers by the droves. Writers, who do not have to be vetted by agents and editors, and therefore don’t have to know The Rules. A few clicks, and the whole world will be confused by an onslaught of unruly stories that will redefine the genre.

Bye-bye, Nora...

Last Updated on Sunday, 09 January 2011 12:43
 
«StartPrev12NextEnd»

Page 1 of 2